<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 47 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19137</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1989-90. It was held that the Assessing Officer did not have valid reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment, as required by law. The court found discrepancies in the reasons provided for initiating the proceedings, particularly regarding the computation of book profit under section 115J. Consequently, the notice dated March 18, 1994, was deemed unsustainable and was quashed without costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:24:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 47 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19137</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1989-90. It was held that the Assessing Officer did not have valid reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment, as required by law. The court found discrepancies in the reasons provided for initiating the proceedings, particularly regarding the computation of book profit under section 115J. Consequently, the notice dated March 18, 1994, was deemed unsustainable and was quashed without costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>