<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (2) TMI 13 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282205</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed with costs, and the order of the lower court was confirmed. The Court extended the time for the defendants to comply with the order by one month. The Court advised the defendants to get the company to join as a confirming party to the lease, stating that there should be no difficulty in doing so if the defendants seriously intended to comply with the order. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to undertakings given to the Court and the serious consequences of failing to do so.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:41:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (2) TMI 13 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282205</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed with costs, and the order of the lower court was confirmed. The Court extended the time for the defendants to comply with the order by one month. The Court advised the defendants to get the company to join as a confirming party to the lease, stating that there should be no difficulty in doing so if the defendants seriously intended to comply with the order. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to undertakings given to the Court and the serious consequences of failing to do so.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>