<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1241 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383545</link>
    <description>A clerical error in the invoice and Form-31 did not negate the finding of intention to evade tax where the disclosed import of P.P. fabric differed in composition and 25 bags of unlaminated fabric were not disclosed as required. The concealment finding was sustained, but the maximum penalty was treated as disproportionate because the total quantity matched the intercepted consignment and the lapse did not justify levy at the highest rate. The penalty was therefore reduced, while liability on the core allegation of evasion was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 08:29:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1241 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383545</link>
      <description>A clerical error in the invoice and Form-31 did not negate the finding of intention to evade tax where the disclosed import of P.P. fabric differed in composition and 25 bags of unlaminated fabric were not disclosed as required. The concealment finding was sustained, but the maximum penalty was treated as disproportionate because the total quantity matched the intercepted consignment and the lapse did not justify levy at the highest rate. The penalty was therefore reduced, while liability on the core allegation of evasion was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>