<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 19 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19127</link>
    <description>The court found the search conducted under section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to be illegal and lacking the necessary information. The search was deemed to be without jurisdiction as the authorities failed to provide substantive evidence or meet the required conditions. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, ruling in favor of the petitioner and awarding costs of Rs. 10,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:02:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 19 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19127</link>
      <description>The court found the search conducted under section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to be illegal and lacking the necessary information. The search was deemed to be without jurisdiction as the authorities failed to provide substantive evidence or meet the required conditions. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, ruling in favor of the petitioner and awarding costs of Rs. 10,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>