<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 14 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19119</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the revision filed by the assessee, granting a deduction for medical center expenses and depreciation. However, the court upheld the decisions on disallowances of motor car expenses, profession tax deduction, and rubber nursery expenditure due to lack of evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:47:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 14 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19119</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the revision filed by the assessee, granting a deduction for medical center expenses and depreciation. However, the court upheld the decisions on disallowances of motor car expenses, profession tax deduction, and rubber nursery expenditure due to lack of evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>