<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1566 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282181</link>
    <description>The appeals of the assessee were allowed in part. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to reconsider the legal issues related to the assessment order under s. 143(3) and the penalty under s. 271(1)(c). Additionally, the disallowance of expenses was modified, with the AO instructed to restrict the disallowance to 1/10th of the expenditure. The penalty order was restored for reconsideration in light of the quantum appeal being restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1566 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282181</link>
      <description>The appeals of the assessee were allowed in part. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to reconsider the legal issues related to the assessment order under s. 143(3) and the penalty under s. 271(1)(c). Additionally, the disallowance of expenses was modified, with the AO instructed to restrict the disallowance to 1/10th of the expenditure. The penalty order was restored for reconsideration in light of the quantum appeal being restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>