<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 17 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19115</link>
    <description>Commission of inquiry expenses incurred in the relevant assessment year were examined for deductibility as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal had treated the outlay as outside normal business hazard and not wholly and exclusively for business purposes, but the High Court applied its earlier decisions involving the same assessee and followed the same reasoning. The expenditure was held to be allowable as revenue expenditure, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:39:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 17 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19115</link>
      <description>Commission of inquiry expenses incurred in the relevant assessment year were examined for deductibility as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal had treated the outlay as outside normal business hazard and not wholly and exclusively for business purposes, but the High Court applied its earlier decisions involving the same assessee and followed the same reasoning. The expenditure was held to be allowable as revenue expenditure, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>