<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1221 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383525</link>
    <description>An appeal cannot be continued after the appellant&#039;s death unless the legal representatives are brought on record through proper substitution. Where the appellant had died and no legal representatives were available to participate or engage counsel, the procedural consequence under the rule governing death of a party applied. The appeal was therefore treated as having abated and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1221 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383525</link>
      <description>An appeal cannot be continued after the appellant&#039;s death unless the legal representatives are brought on record through proper substitution. Where the appellant had died and no legal representatives were available to participate or engage counsel, the procedural consequence under the rule governing death of a party applied. The appeal was therefore treated as having abated and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>