<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1217 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383521</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to classify the derivative trading loss as a business loss rather than a speculative loss. The Tribunal relied on the amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2005, which excluded eligible derivative transactions from being deemed speculative if conducted through a recognized stock exchange. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s argument that the Explanation to section 73 of the Income Tax Act should override this classification, emphasizing that prior decisions were not applicable post-amendment. The Tribunal affirmed that losses from derivative trading should be treated as business losses, allowing set-off against other business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1217 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383521</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to classify the derivative trading loss as a business loss rather than a speculative loss. The Tribunal relied on the amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2005, which excluded eligible derivative transactions from being deemed speculative if conducted through a recognized stock exchange. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s argument that the Explanation to section 73 of the Income Tax Act should override this classification, emphasizing that prior decisions were not applicable post-amendment. The Tribunal affirmed that losses from derivative trading should be treated as business losses, allowing set-off against other business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>