<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1199 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383503</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, highlighting the lack of incriminating evidence to justify the rejection of account books. Despite a discrepancy between recorded stock and survey findings, the Court found no basis for rejecting the books or estimating turnover. Emphasizing the importance of concrete proof in assessments, the Court allowed the revision, underscoring the need to consider actual circumstances and evidence before resorting to best judgment assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:49:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1199 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383503</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, highlighting the lack of incriminating evidence to justify the rejection of account books. Despite a discrepancy between recorded stock and survey findings, the Court found no basis for rejecting the books or estimating turnover. Emphasizing the importance of concrete proof in assessments, the Court allowed the revision, underscoring the need to consider actual circumstances and evidence before resorting to best judgment assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>