<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1196 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383500</link>
    <description>Furnishing inventory particulars in the prescribed Form-A was mandatory for claiming input tax credit under the U.P. VAT Rules, 2008. The Court held that supplying the same information in another format, including electronically or in a voluminous form, did not amount to valid compliance because the rule required adherence to the prescribed form. As the assessee failed to file the particulars in Form-A, denial of input tax credit was upheld and the revision was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 08:49:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1196 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383500</link>
      <description>Furnishing inventory particulars in the prescribed Form-A was mandatory for claiming input tax credit under the U.P. VAT Rules, 2008. The Court held that supplying the same information in another format, including electronically or in a voluminous form, did not amount to valid compliance because the rule required adherence to the prescribed form. As the assessee failed to file the particulars in Form-A, denial of input tax credit was upheld and the revision was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>