<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (5) TMI 16 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19107</link>
    <description>An appeal lies against an order rejecting, on limitation grounds, an application for registration or continuation of registration where the applicant seeks condonation of delay on the basis of sufficient cause. Applying the Supreme Court&#039;s settled position, the High Court treated the appellate order granting condonation of delay and continuation of registration as legally sustainable and answered the reference in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:24:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (5) TMI 16 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19107</link>
      <description>An appeal lies against an order rejecting, on limitation grounds, an application for registration or continuation of registration where the applicant seeks condonation of delay on the basis of sufficient cause. Applying the Supreme Court&#039;s settled position, the High Court treated the appellate order granting condonation of delay and continuation of registration as legally sustainable and answered the reference in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>