<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1170 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383474</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the appellant is liable to pay interest for the normal period as prescribed by law. The case was remanded back to the original authority to quantify the interest for the normal period of one year, as the substantial period in both appeals was deemed to be beyond limitation. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 06:50:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1170 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383474</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the appellant is liable to pay interest for the normal period as prescribed by law. The case was remanded back to the original authority to quantify the interest for the normal period of one year, as the substantial period in both appeals was deemed to be beyond limitation. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>