https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282171 Recurring noise, protest activity, loudspeakers, barricading and related disturbances were treated as public nuisance capable of impairing the right to peaceful living and residence under Article 21. The Supreme Court's noise-control principles and the binding effect of earlier directions were applied to support protective and remedial intervention. Existing remedial measures were found inadequate unless strictly and continuously implemented, so the State was required to ensure effective regulation of demonstrations, loudspeakers, sanitation and barricading through concrete enforcement by the concerned authorities. The impugned order was modified and additional enforceable directions were issued to secure peaceful enjoyment of residence and curb nuisance in the area. en-us Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jul 2019 20:56:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282171 Recurring noise, protest activity, loudspeakers, barricading and related disturbances were treated as public nuisance capable of impairing the right to peaceful living and residence under Article 21. The Supreme Court's noise-control principles and the binding effect of earlier directions were applied to support protective and remedial intervention. Existing remedial measures were found inadequate unless strictly and continuously implemented, so the State was required to ensure effective regulation of demonstrations, loudspeakers, sanitation and barricading through concrete enforcement by the concerned authorities. The impugned order was modified and additional enforceable directions were issued to secure peaceful enjoyment of residence and curb nuisance in the area. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282171