https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282170 The court dismissed the petition due to delay in re-filing and on the merits, upholding the arbitral award. The petitioners failed to timely re-file the petition challenging the arbitral award, with explanations for delay deemed unpersuasive. Despite contentions of the award being perverse, the court upheld the arbitrator's decision, finding it well-reasoned and not against public policy. The petitioners' non-participation in arbitration and failure to fulfill obligations under the Coal Purchase Agreement weakened their case, leading to the dismissal of their petition. en-us Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jul 2019 20:56:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282170 The court dismissed the petition due to delay in re-filing and on the merits, upholding the arbitral award. The petitioners failed to timely re-file the petition challenging the arbitral award, with explanations for delay deemed unpersuasive. Despite contentions of the award being perverse, the court upheld the arbitrator's decision, finding it well-reasoned and not against public policy. The petitioners' non-participation in arbitration and failure to fulfill obligations under the Coal Purchase Agreement weakened their case, leading to the dismissal of their petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282170