<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1670 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282173</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partially allowed the Assessee&#039;s Cross Objection, resolving multiple issues raised during the assessment. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions for understated production, interest expenses disallowance, old liability towards M/s Om Steel, and scrap value of replaced wire winding. However, it confirmed the addition for estimated expenditure on shed construction and disallowance of professional fees for non-deduction of TDS. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on the adequacy of information provided and relevant legal precedents, resulting in a mixed outcome for both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 20:56:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=581017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1670 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282173</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partially allowed the Assessee&#039;s Cross Objection, resolving multiple issues raised during the assessment. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of additions for understated production, interest expenses disallowance, old liability towards M/s Om Steel, and scrap value of replaced wire winding. However, it confirmed the addition for estimated expenditure on shed construction and disallowance of professional fees for non-deduction of TDS. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on the adequacy of information provided and relevant legal precedents, resulting in a mixed outcome for both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>