<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 23 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19093</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that advance tax should not be deducted when valuing shares for wealth tax purposes. Additionally, the court determined that a compulsory deposit qualifies as an asset under the Wealth-tax Act, emphasizing that it falls within the broad definition of &quot;property&quot; and should be included in the assessee&#039;s net wealth.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:15:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 23 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19093</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that advance tax should not be deducted when valuing shares for wealth tax purposes. Additionally, the court determined that a compulsory deposit qualifies as an asset under the Wealth-tax Act, emphasizing that it falls within the broad definition of &quot;property&quot; and should be included in the assessee&#039;s net wealth.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>