<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (6) TMI 3 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19087</link>
    <description>The court held that the income assigned by beneficiaries to a charitable trust was divested at the source and could not be taxed in the beneficiaries&#039; hands. By relinquishing their right to receive a portion of the income, the beneficiaries diverted the income to the charitable trust. Drawing on legal precedents, the court distinguished between the application of income and diversion of income, ultimately dismissing the petition and ruling in favor of the charitable trust.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:42:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (6) TMI 3 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19087</link>
      <description>The court held that the income assigned by beneficiaries to a charitable trust was divested at the source and could not be taxed in the beneficiaries&#039; hands. By relinquishing their right to receive a portion of the income, the beneficiaries diverted the income to the charitable trust. Drawing on legal precedents, the court distinguished between the application of income and diversion of income, ultimately dismissing the petition and ruling in favor of the charitable trust.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>