<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 42 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19083</link>
    <description>In reference proceedings, only a question of law arising from the Tribunal&#039;s order is referable; a pure finding of fact, or a question not arising from the order, cannot be compelled for reference. The Delhi HC held that the proposed issue on annual letting value disclosed a legal controversy and could be recast in proper form, so it was directed to be referred. The proposed issue based on application of an earlier year&#039;s decision was rejected because it did not strictly arise from the Tribunal&#039;s order. The issue on loss from sale of shares and allowance of long-term capital loss was also declined as it turned on appreciation of evidence and a factual finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:13:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=58082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 42 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19083</link>
      <description>In reference proceedings, only a question of law arising from the Tribunal&#039;s order is referable; a pure finding of fact, or a question not arising from the order, cannot be compelled for reference. The Delhi HC held that the proposed issue on annual letting value disclosed a legal controversy and could be recast in proper form, so it was directed to be referred. The proposed issue based on application of an earlier year&#039;s decision was rejected because it did not strictly arise from the Tribunal&#039;s order. The issue on loss from sale of shares and allowance of long-term capital loss was also declined as it turned on appreciation of evidence and a factual finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=19083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>