https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282162 The Supreme Court noted a discrepancy in a notification related to exemption from Central Excise duty, mentioning Khasra instead of Khatauni numbers for the appellant's industry. The Court agreed with the appellant's argument, setting aside the judgment and remitting the matter to the High Court for reconsideration. The Union of India's appeal was also allowed, emphasizing the importance of accurate identification in legal notifications and precise interpretation of terms like Khasra and Khatauni numbers in matters of excise duty exemptions. The directive for prompt disposal by the High Court underscores the judiciary's commitment to timely justice delivery. en-us Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:30:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282162 The Supreme Court noted a discrepancy in a notification related to exemption from Central Excise duty, mentioning Khasra instead of Khatauni numbers for the appellant's industry. The Court agreed with the appellant's argument, setting aside the judgment and remitting the matter to the High Court for reconsideration. The Union of India's appeal was also allowed, emphasizing the importance of accurate identification in legal notifications and precise interpretation of terms like Khasra and Khatauni numbers in matters of excise duty exemptions. The directive for prompt disposal by the High Court underscores the judiciary's commitment to timely justice delivery. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282162