https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282160 A medical institute functioning within a statutory university framework, receiving substantial public funding and subject to public control, was treated as performing a public duty and as an instrumentality of State in substance; it was therefore amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226. On admissions, the petitioners were found to have higher merit than selected candidates, and the refusal to admit them could not be justified on the record. The Court held that admission had to follow merit and directed admission for the current term without disturbing admissions already made to others. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:15:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282160 A medical institute functioning within a statutory university framework, receiving substantial public funding and subject to public control, was treated as performing a public duty and as an instrumentality of State in substance; it was therefore amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226. On admissions, the petitioners were found to have higher merit than selected candidates, and the refusal to admit them could not be justified on the record. The Court held that admission had to follow merit and directed admission for the current term without disturbing admissions already made to others. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282160