https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282158 Review jurisdiction is confined to narrow limits and cannot be used as a disguised appeal or a device to obtain reconsideration of a concluded judgment. A request framed as clarification could not reopen the earlier writ decision, particularly where the disputed pay-scale issue had not been adjudicated in that proceeding and any fresh challenge had to be raised in an appropriate proceeding on its own merits, subject to res judicata and constructive res judicata. Subsequent events may give rise to a new cause of action, but contempt proceedings and a plea of compliance did not justify review of the final judgment. The review application was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed. en-us Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Feb 2024 17:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282158 Review jurisdiction is confined to narrow limits and cannot be used as a disguised appeal or a device to obtain reconsideration of a concluded judgment. A request framed as clarification could not reopen the earlier writ decision, particularly where the disputed pay-scale issue had not been adjudicated in that proceeding and any fresh challenge had to be raised in an appropriate proceeding on its own merits, subject to res judicata and constructive res judicata. Subsequent events may give rise to a new cause of action, but contempt proceedings and a plea of compliance did not justify review of the final judgment. The review application was therefore not maintainable and was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282158