<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1152 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383456</link>
    <description>Interest on non-performing assets for a non-banking financial company was required to be tested against the RBI income-recognition directions then in force, which treated such interest as accruable only on actual realisation. The Court noted that the earlier CBDT circular had been superseded for the relevant period and that the applicable government notification under the Companies Act also had to be considered. Because the Tribunal and appellate authority did not apply the later regime correctly or fully examine whether the assets had become non-performing in the assessment year concerned, the inclusion of such interest could not be sustained on that basis and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1152 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383456</link>
      <description>Interest on non-performing assets for a non-banking financial company was required to be tested against the RBI income-recognition directions then in force, which treated such interest as accruable only on actual realisation. The Court noted that the earlier CBDT circular had been superseded for the relevant period and that the applicable government notification under the Companies Act also had to be considered. Because the Tribunal and appellate authority did not apply the later regime correctly or fully examine whether the assets had become non-performing in the assessment year concerned, the inclusion of such interest could not be sustained on that basis and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>