<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1142 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL GUWAHATI BENCH: GUWAHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383446</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the claim by the Operational Creditor, ruling that the claim submission deadline was within 90 days of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiation, not until resolution plan approval. The rejection was deemed lawful, and the Tribunal lacked authority to overturn it. Parties were directed to cover their own costs, as the resolution process had concluded with the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s approval of the resolution plan.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:47:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1142 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL GUWAHATI BENCH: GUWAHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383446</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the claim by the Operational Creditor, ruling that the claim submission deadline was within 90 days of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiation, not until resolution plan approval. The rejection was deemed lawful, and the Tribunal lacked authority to overturn it. Parties were directed to cover their own costs, as the resolution process had concluded with the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s approval of the resolution plan.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>