<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1141 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383445</link>
    <description>Liability to service tax on club health club and fitness centre services was linked to the doctrine of mutuality, with the issue stated to be pending before the Supreme Court in a larger bench matter. In view of that pending determination, the Tribunal considered it unnecessary to keep the appeal awaiting the Supreme Court outcome and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after the Supreme Court proceedings are concluded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1141 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383445</link>
      <description>Liability to service tax on club health club and fitness centre services was linked to the doctrine of mutuality, with the issue stated to be pending before the Supreme Court in a larger bench matter. In view of that pending determination, the Tribunal considered it unnecessary to keep the appeal awaiting the Supreme Court outcome and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after the Supreme Court proceedings are concluded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>