<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1140 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383444</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad remanded the case regarding the inclusion of third-party inspection charges in the assessable value of excisable goods. The appellant&#039;s request for similar treatment as in a previous case was granted, and the matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration based on earlier observations. The decision underscores the significance of applying legal principles consistently and following precedents in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1140 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383444</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad remanded the case regarding the inclusion of third-party inspection charges in the assessable value of excisable goods. The appellant&#039;s request for similar treatment as in a previous case was granted, and the matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration based on earlier observations. The decision underscores the significance of applying legal principles consistently and following precedents in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>