https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383439 The Delhi High Court granted limited interim relief to the petitioner in a challenge against the National Anti-Profiteering Authority's inquiry into their product. The Court directed the petitioner to provide information only on the complained product until the next date, allowing the inquiry to proceed. The judgment emphasized adherence to procedural requirements under the CGST Rules and highlighted concerns over the breadth of information sought without proper steps being taken. The case raises legal questions on the validity of Section 171 of the CGST Act and related rules, underscoring the importance of procedural fairness in anti-profiteering investigations. en-us Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Mar 2025 11:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383439 The Delhi High Court granted limited interim relief to the petitioner in a challenge against the National Anti-Profiteering Authority's inquiry into their product. The Court directed the petitioner to provide information only on the complained product until the next date, allowing the inquiry to proceed. The judgment emphasized adherence to procedural requirements under the CGST Rules and highlighted concerns over the breadth of information sought without proper steps being taken. The case raises legal questions on the validity of Section 171 of the CGST Act and related rules, underscoring the importance of procedural fairness in anti-profiteering investigations. Case-Laws GST Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383439