<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1125 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383429</link>
    <description>Penalty for alleged non-accounting of goods under the U.P. Trade Tax Act could not be sustained where the record contained no adverse finding that the invoices were unnumbered or that the goods were absent from the assessee&#039;s books of account. Mere technical defects in transport documents, including incomplete columns in Form 49 and temporary non-production of some invoices at detention, were insufficient to prove improper accounting when the books and invoices were produced before seizure. The Tribunal&#039;s contrary inference lacked support in the record, so the finding of guilt was held perverse and the issue was decided for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:35:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1125 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383429</link>
      <description>Penalty for alleged non-accounting of goods under the U.P. Trade Tax Act could not be sustained where the record contained no adverse finding that the invoices were unnumbered or that the goods were absent from the assessee&#039;s books of account. Mere technical defects in transport documents, including incomplete columns in Form 49 and temporary non-production of some invoices at detention, were insufficient to prove improper accounting when the books and invoices were produced before seizure. The Tribunal&#039;s contrary inference lacked support in the record, so the finding of guilt was held perverse and the issue was decided for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>