<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petitioner Questions Tribunal&#039;s Jurisdiction Over CCI Orders Issued Without Judicial Member; Validity of Orders Upheld.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48181</link>
    <description>Jurisdiction of the tribunal - petitioner contends that the impugned orders were passed without the presence of a judicial member - notwithstanding, that a judicial member is required to be appointed to CCI, the orders passed by the CCI pending such appointment cannot be called into question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:03:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:03:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petitioner Questions Tribunal&#039;s Jurisdiction Over CCI Orders Issued Without Judicial Member; Validity of Orders Upheld.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48181</link>
      <description>Jurisdiction of the tribunal - petitioner contends that the impugned orders were passed without the presence of a judicial member - notwithstanding, that a judicial member is required to be appointed to CCI, the orders passed by the CCI pending such appointment cannot be called into question.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 07:03:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>