<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer Pricing Case Rejects CUP Method for Export Pricing Due to Geographical Differences Impacting Arm&#039;s Length Price Assessment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48163</link>
    <description>TP adjustment in export of finished goods to AE - comparison of the price charged to non–AEs located in India with the price charged to AEs in foreign countries cannot be considered to be a CUP to determine the ALP being situated in different geographical locations, as there may be various factors/reasons which could have influenced the price charged - CUP rejected</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 06:44:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 06:44:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer Pricing Case Rejects CUP Method for Export Pricing Due to Geographical Differences Impacting Arm&#039;s Length Price Assessment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48163</link>
      <description>TP adjustment in export of finished goods to AE - comparison of the price charged to non–AEs located in India with the price charged to AEs in foreign countries cannot be considered to be a CUP to determine the ALP being situated in different geographical locations, as there may be various factors/reasons which could have influenced the price charged - CUP rejected</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 06:44:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=48163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>