<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1669 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282145</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the application under section 7 of the I&amp;amp;B Code, declared a moratorium, appointed an IRP, and directed further actions for the resolution process. The judgment emphasized the importance of proving debt and default for admission of CIRP, underscoring the broad interpretation of financial debt under the Code.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 06:44:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1669 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282145</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the application under section 7 of the I&amp;amp;B Code, declared a moratorium, appointed an IRP, and directed further actions for the resolution process. The judgment emphasized the importance of proving debt and default for admission of CIRP, underscoring the broad interpretation of financial debt under the Code.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>