<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (12) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282133</link>
    <description>Process in a criminal complaint may be issued only by the Magistrate who has taken cognizance under section 204 CrPC, or by another Magistrate after a valid transfer of the case, in which event section 202 applies. Where no transfer has been made, a Magistrate who did not take cognizance lacks jurisdiction to issue process. The document also notes that an observation about evidence coming from tainted sources indicated there was no case to proceed with. On that basis, the process was quashed and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:42:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (12) TMI 117 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282133</link>
      <description>Process in a criminal complaint may be issued only by the Magistrate who has taken cognizance under section 204 CrPC, or by another Magistrate after a valid transfer of the case, in which event section 202 applies. Where no transfer has been made, a Magistrate who did not take cognizance lacks jurisdiction to issue process. The document also notes that an observation about evidence coming from tainted sources indicated there was no case to proceed with. On that basis, the process was quashed and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>