<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 831 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282129</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the deletion of addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act for Keyman Insurance premium and undervaluation of closing stock of shares and bonds. The Tribunal supported the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning that the expenses were incurred for commercial expediency and that the valuation method used by the appellant was consistent with accounting standards and legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:10:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 831 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282129</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the deletion of addition made by the Assessing Officer under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act for Keyman Insurance premium and undervaluation of closing stock of shares and bonds. The Tribunal supported the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning that the expenses were incurred for commercial expediency and that the valuation method used by the appellant was consistent with accounting standards and legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>