<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 468 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282125</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision to alter the respondent&#039;s date of birth from 6.9.1930 to 4.9.1934, citing inconsistencies and lack of timely action by the respondent. The Court emphasized the importance of timely correction requests for date of birth, as established in Union of India v. Harnam Singh, and rejected the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, denying the respondent&#039;s claim for correction and associated benefits. The appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal&#039;s directions were invalidated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 10:18:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 468 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282125</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision to alter the respondent&#039;s date of birth from 6.9.1930 to 4.9.1934, citing inconsistencies and lack of timely action by the respondent. The Court emphasized the importance of timely correction requests for date of birth, as established in Union of India v. Harnam Singh, and rejected the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, denying the respondent&#039;s claim for correction and associated benefits. The appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal&#039;s directions were invalidated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>