https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383405 In a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the accused was not entitled at the pre-charge stage to obtain every deficient or illegible document under Sections 207 and 208 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The special trial framework under Section 44(1)(d) of the PMLA did not require the CrPC to apply mutatis mutandis so as to enlarge disclosure beyond the documents relied upon by the prosecution. Because the matter had not yet reached the stage of trial, the accused could not demand all material collected during investigation. Authorities on fair access to material were distinguished as governing the course of trial, not the pre-charge stage. en-us Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jul 2019 07:08:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383405 In a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the accused was not entitled at the pre-charge stage to obtain every deficient or illegible document under Sections 207 and 208 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The special trial framework under Section 44(1)(d) of the PMLA did not require the CrPC to apply mutatis mutandis so as to enlarge disclosure beyond the documents relied upon by the prosecution. Because the matter had not yet reached the stage of trial, the accused could not demand all material collected during investigation. Authorities on fair access to material were distinguished as governing the course of trial, not the pre-charge stage. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383405