<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1088 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383392</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the re-export directive for imported goods due to labeling defects, emphasizing compliance with Food Safety Standards Regulations 2011. Non-compliance and delay in re-export led to decreased value and dismissal of the appeal, with the Tribunal emphasizing adherence to labeling standards for alcoholic beverages like wine. Despite the lapse of time, the Tribunal found no grounds to alter its decision, noting the impact of delay on goods&#039; usability and value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1088 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383392</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the re-export directive for imported goods due to labeling defects, emphasizing compliance with Food Safety Standards Regulations 2011. Non-compliance and delay in re-export led to decreased value and dismissal of the appeal, with the Tribunal emphasizing adherence to labeling standards for alcoholic beverages like wine. Despite the lapse of time, the Tribunal found no grounds to alter its decision, noting the impact of delay on goods&#039; usability and value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>