https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282114 The High Court upheld the legality of the provisional attachment order dated 18.11.2017, finding sufficient basis for the order and declining to interfere. It determined that the proceedings under section 26 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 were valid, emphasizing the role of the adjudicating authority in deciding on the matter. The Court dismissed the petitioner's request to vacate the attachment and release assets, declaring the Act applicable and denying further relief, ultimately dismissing the writ petition. en-us Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 18:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282114 The High Court upheld the legality of the provisional attachment order dated 18.11.2017, finding sufficient basis for the order and declining to interfere. It determined that the proceedings under section 26 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 were valid, emphasizing the role of the adjudicating authority in deciding on the matter. The Court dismissed the petitioner's request to vacate the attachment and release assets, declaring the Act applicable and denying further relief, ultimately dismissing the writ petition. Case-Laws Benami Property Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282114