<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 885 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282106</link>
    <description>Withdrawal of an earlier appeal without liberty bars a fresh appeal against the same order, because the principle underlying Order 23 Rule 1 CPC applies to appeals as well. The Court further held that an order rejecting review merely declines to exercise review jurisdiction and does not directly and immediately affect any valuable right; it is therefore not a judgment under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent and is not appealable under the CPC. On that basis, a second appeal challenging both the original order and the dismissal of review was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 885 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282106</link>
      <description>Withdrawal of an earlier appeal without liberty bars a fresh appeal against the same order, because the principle underlying Order 23 Rule 1 CPC applies to appeals as well. The Court further held that an order rejecting review merely declines to exercise review jurisdiction and does not directly and immediately affect any valuable right; it is therefore not a judgment under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent and is not appealable under the CPC. On that basis, a second appeal challenging both the original order and the dismissal of review was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>