<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1067 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383371</link>
    <description>The court directed the immediate release of the goods owned by the petitioner after the petitioner deposited the tax and penalty amount promptly following the seizure of the truck and goods. Despite the invocation of sections 129 and 130 of the GST Act by the authorities, the court emphasized compliance with tax laws and the obligation to release goods upon payment of dues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1067 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383371</link>
      <description>The court directed the immediate release of the goods owned by the petitioner after the petitioner deposited the tax and penalty amount promptly following the seizure of the truck and goods. Despite the invocation of sections 129 and 130 of the GST Act by the authorities, the court emphasized compliance with tax laws and the obligation to release goods upon payment of dues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>