<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1065 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383369</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court treated the controversy as identical to an earlier decision and applied that binding precedent without any fresh distinguishing feature being shown. On that basis, the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee. The Court also left it open for the assessee to seek refund of the customs duty paid, without deciding the refund claim itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2019 07:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1065 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383369</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court treated the controversy as identical to an earlier decision and applied that binding precedent without any fresh distinguishing feature being shown. On that basis, the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee. The Court also left it open for the assessee to seek refund of the customs duty paid, without deciding the refund claim itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>