<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1059 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383363</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reduced penalties imposed on a shipping company, M/s Perma Shipping Line (I) Pvt. Ltd., for its role in a smuggling case involving Red Sanders concealed as machinery parts. Despite involvement, the company&#039;s lack of active participation in the smuggling led to a significant reduction in penalties, aligning with a previous judgment involving a freight forwarder. The Tribunal emphasized proportionality in penalty imposition, considering the gravity of the offense and the level of involvement of the parties. The penalty on the company was reduced from &amp;amp;8377; 130.00 lakhs to &amp;amp;8377; 1.00 lakh, showcasing a balanced approach in penalizing entities in smuggling cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 08:20:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1059 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383363</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reduced penalties imposed on a shipping company, M/s Perma Shipping Line (I) Pvt. Ltd., for its role in a smuggling case involving Red Sanders concealed as machinery parts. Despite involvement, the company&#039;s lack of active participation in the smuggling led to a significant reduction in penalties, aligning with a previous judgment involving a freight forwarder. The Tribunal emphasized proportionality in penalty imposition, considering the gravity of the offense and the level of involvement of the parties. The penalty on the company was reduced from &amp;amp;8377; 130.00 lakhs to &amp;amp;8377; 1.00 lakh, showcasing a balanced approach in penalizing entities in smuggling cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>