<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1039 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383343</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the assessment order passed during the pendency of a stay was in violation of the interim order and thus void. The court quashed the assessment order and related demands, remitting the matter back for fresh consideration by the Assistant Commissioner, directing the petitioner to appear for a new hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2019 07:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1039 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383343</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the assessment order passed during the pendency of a stay was in violation of the interim order and thus void. The court quashed the assessment order and related demands, remitting the matter back for fresh consideration by the Assistant Commissioner, directing the petitioner to appear for a new hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>