<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1037 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383341</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the orders of the first appellate authority and the Tribunal. It restored the assessing officer&#039;s order, stating that the assessee&#039;s speculative business losses could not be set off against income from other sources. The Court held that the exception under the Explanation to Section 73 did not apply to the company, as its income mainly comprised sources other than business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 08:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1037 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383341</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, setting aside the orders of the first appellate authority and the Tribunal. It restored the assessing officer&#039;s order, stating that the assessee&#039;s speculative business losses could not be set off against income from other sources. The Court held that the exception under the Explanation to Section 73 did not apply to the company, as its income mainly comprised sources other than business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>