https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383313 Interference under Article 226 was declined because the dispute concerned assessment merits under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and an efficacious statutory appeal was available. The petitioner had already pursued an earlier appeal, the matter had been remitted, and the respondent thereafter issued notice with purchase invoice details and granted personal hearing. As no objections were filed, the grievance was treated as one fit for adjudication in the appellate forum rather than writ jurisdiction. The writ petition was not entertained, and the petitioner was relegated to the statutory appeal remedy, leaving the substantive issues open there. en-us Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:19:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383313 Interference under Article 226 was declined because the dispute concerned assessment merits under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and an efficacious statutory appeal was available. The petitioner had already pursued an earlier appeal, the matter had been remitted, and the respondent thereafter issued notice with purchase invoice details and granted personal hearing. As no objections were filed, the grievance was treated as one fit for adjudication in the appellate forum rather than writ jurisdiction. The writ petition was not entertained, and the petitioner was relegated to the statutory appeal remedy, leaving the substantive issues open there. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383313