https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383311 Prospective application of the rule on supply of the inquiry report meant that disciplinary orders passed before the relevant cut-off could not be invalidated solely for non-supply of that report. Where the inquiry report is favourable to the delinquent and the disciplinary authority proposes to differ, natural justice requires communication of the reasons of disagreement before the adverse order is made. The text also states that, although one charge was found proved, it was for the disciplinary authority to decide whether that charge alone justified removal; in the circumstances, remand was the proper course and consequential benefits were to be reconsidered. en-us Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:19:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383311 Prospective application of the rule on supply of the inquiry report meant that disciplinary orders passed before the relevant cut-off could not be invalidated solely for non-supply of that report. Where the inquiry report is favourable to the delinquent and the disciplinary authority proposes to differ, natural justice requires communication of the reasons of disagreement before the adverse order is made. The text also states that, although one charge was found proved, it was for the disciplinary authority to decide whether that charge alone justified removal; in the circumstances, remand was the proper course and consequential benefits were to be reconsidered. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383311