<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1004 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383308</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for air lifting charges but set aside the demand for duty on storage charges based on the interpretation of valuation provisions and the applicability of limitation. The penalty on the appellant for air lifting charges was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:18:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1004 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383308</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for air lifting charges but set aside the demand for duty on storage charges based on the interpretation of valuation provisions and the applicability of limitation. The penalty on the appellant for air lifting charges was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>