<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 379 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282090</link>
    <description>An appeal against an order refusing review is barred where the challenge is directed only at the review rejection and not at the original judgment and decree. Applying Order XLVII Rule 7 CPC, the court treated such an appeal as incompetent because the statute does not permit an appeal from an order rejecting an application for review. The appeal was therefore held not maintainable and rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2019 18:27:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 379 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282090</link>
      <description>An appeal against an order refusing review is barred where the challenge is directed only at the review rejection and not at the original judgment and decree. Applying Order XLVII Rule 7 CPC, the court treated such an appeal as incompetent because the statute does not permit an appeal from an order rejecting an application for review. The appeal was therefore held not maintainable and rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>