<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (1) TMI 210 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282083</link>
    <description>Affidavits under Order 19 Rule 3(1) CPC must ordinarily be confined to facts within the deponent&#039;s own knowledge; in interlocutory matters, statements on belief may be allowed only if the grounds and source are stated. Where an affidavit does not disclose the basis of information or belief, it is not properly verified and cannot be treated as reliable evidence. On that standard, the supporting and replying affidavits were found defective and were treated as valueless.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2019 12:24:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (1) TMI 210 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282083</link>
      <description>Affidavits under Order 19 Rule 3(1) CPC must ordinarily be confined to facts within the deponent&#039;s own knowledge; in interlocutory matters, statements on belief may be allowed only if the grounds and source are stated. Where an affidavit does not disclose the basis of information or belief, it is not properly verified and cannot be treated as reliable evidence. On that standard, the supporting and replying affidavits were found defective and were treated as valueless.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=282083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>