<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment of Bill of Entry</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=115210</link>
    <description>Post-import demurrage payments may constitute additional consideration for customs valuation. The advisory distinguishes that ship demurrage is not includable in the assessable value, but non-ship demurrage (such as port demurrage) must be incorporated into the customs assessable value. The response addresses valuation only and does not expressly decide whether a revised Bill of Entry should be issued or presented to the authorised dealer bank as proof of import.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2019 11:43:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=580246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment of Bill of Entry</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=115210</link>
      <description>Post-import demurrage payments may constitute additional consideration for customs valuation. The advisory distinguishes that ship demurrage is not includable in the assessable value, but non-ship demurrage (such as port demurrage) must be incorporated into the customs assessable value. The response addresses valuation only and does not expressly decide whether a revised Bill of Entry should be issued or presented to the authorised dealer bank as proof of import.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2019 11:43:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=115210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>