https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383303 Jurisdiction under the GST arrangement was challenged on the ground that the impugned notice and consequential order fell within the Centre's allocated taxpayer base, not the State authorities' competence. The petitioner relied on the GST provisions, Council guidelines, and the circular and order governing division of jurisdiction to seek protection against further action. The stated conclusion is that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner pursuant to the show cause notice and the final order until further proceedings. en-us Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jul 2019 09:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383303 Jurisdiction under the GST arrangement was challenged on the ground that the impugned notice and consequential order fell within the Centre's allocated taxpayer base, not the State authorities' competence. The petitioner relied on the GST provisions, Council guidelines, and the circular and order governing division of jurisdiction to seek protection against further action. The stated conclusion is that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner pursuant to the show cause notice and the final order until further proceedings. Case-Laws GST Thu, 16 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=383303